<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"> 
<channel>
<title>Sharlene Wellard Legal Articles</title>
<description>Recent Articles From EvanCarmichael.com</description>
<link>http://www.evancarmichael.com/</link>
<item>
<link>http://www.evancarmichael.com/Legal/2330/Video-surveillance-successfully-used-to-prove-theft-and-justify-termination.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.evancarmichael.com/Legal/2330/Video-surveillance-successfully-used-to-prove-theft-and-justify-termination.html</guid>
<title>Video surveillance successfully used to prove theft and justify termination</title>
<description>The recent unfair dismissal case of Whiting v Greenbank, the Commission found that the termination of an employee, who was accused of stealing $24.00 from the till, was not harsh, unjust or unreasonable.</description>
</item>
<item>
<link>http://www.evancarmichael.com/Legal/2330/The-Commission-clarifies-when-a-qualifying-period-ends.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.evancarmichael.com/Legal/2330/The-Commission-clarifies-when-a-qualifying-period-ends.html</guid>
<title>The Commission clarifies when a qualifying period ends</title>
<description>In the recent decision of Tania Maree Kabel-Pluck v Visy Pulp and Paper Pty Ltd, the Commission found that an employee was not prevented from making an unfair dismissal claim because the date of termination took place after the expiration of the probationary period and the qualifying period. </description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>